Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Images

Submit Manuscript

Journal of Clinical Case Reports and ImagesEditorial Board

Editorial Board

Editorial leadership, clinical expertise and institutional affiliation in one public directory.

Listed members
23
Role groups
3
Available ORCID iDs
10
Editor-in-Chief
Lalit Gupta
I

Editor-in-Chief

The Editor-in-Chief is the named editorial leader for JCCI.

II

Section Editors

Section Editors contribute subject and method expertise within the journal's case-report and clinical-image scope.

III

Editorial Board members

The wider directory is ordered alphabetically. Entries show role, clinical focus, affiliation, profile and an ORCID iD where available.

Editorial Board

Retinal Diseases

Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma | Ophthalmology Unit, Doctor of Medicine Department of Ophthalmology, University "Campus Bio-Medico" of Rome

Editorial Board

SARS-CoV-2

Independent specialist for infectious diseases and general practitioner Außervillgraten, Tyrol, Austria

Editorial Board

cataractsurgery

Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Editorial Board

Urology

Professor & Chairman, Department of Urology, Korea University School of Medicine.

Editorial Board

Cardiovascular

Elected in Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE), Executive Committee as Members of the Membership Committee.

IV

Editorial governance

The Board evaluates Case Reports, Clinical Images, Case Series and Technical Notes anchored to documented patient care. Clinical reasoning and meaningful image-led reporting are assessed on their own merits, including cases spanning several specialties. Reviewer expertise is matched to the clinical question and evidence presented.

Scope and screening

All submissions undergo initial editorial screening. Manuscripts that meet the journal's scope and minimum requirements proceed to independent peer review.

Peer review

Peer review: Single-blind by default; double-blind review is available on request. Manuscripts that proceed to external peer review are normally evaluated by at least two independent subject-matter experts.

Editorial decisions

Editorial decisions are based on scope, scientific quality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, reporting quality, and relevance to the journal.

Conflicts and recusal

Editors disclose competing interests and take no part in handling their own submissions or other manuscripts for which impartiality could reasonably be questioned.

Editorial service does not confer an advantage in the review or acceptance of an editor's own work. Such manuscripts are handled independently without the submitting editor's participation.

Editorial principles and responsibilities

The full policies governing review, competing interests, confidentiality, research integrity, corrections and appeals are maintained on the Editorial Policies page.

Read the Editorial Policies

Menu